On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 08:52:52 +0000 Chris Rees <utis...@gmail.com> mentioned:
> > UPDATING, yes. Also as I reminded you in IRC last week, users of -CURRENT > are expected to follow -current@. Users of ports are also strongly > recommended to read -ports-announce. Repeating that several times does not make it true. > > What are you trying to achieve here? You discussed this previously, and > got exactly the same answer. There were extensive discussions over it in > ports@. I'm trying to point out, that this commit (and previous pkgng ones) was made without proper peer review and consulations, which is a recommended practice in THIS project. Doing so hurts not only the committer reputation (which I frankly do not care about), but the project image as a whole. I really don't want to go in and revert these changes, but I want to find a reasonable solution. It's not the first time an unreviewed ports-related change is being committed to a tree by that hurts us, who actually use FreeBSD and not consider it a personal playground. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
