On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 11:24 -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Ian Lepore <i...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > Author: ian > > Date: Wed Feb 13 15:09:16 2013 > > New Revision: 246763 > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/246763 > > > > Modified: head/lib/libc/sys/fcntl.2 > > > > ============================================================================== > > --- head/lib/libc/sys/fcntl.2 Wed Feb 13 14:57:54 2013 (r246762) > > +++ head/lib/libc/sys/fcntl.2 Wed Feb 13 15:09:16 2013 (r246763) > > @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ argument, > > which is rounded up to the nearest block size. > > A zero value in > > .Fa arg > > -turns off read ahead. > > +turns off read ahead, a negative value restores the system default. > > > > Comma splice?
Perhaps. The two clauses are independent in the grammatical sense, but conceptually not so much. I had initially written a semicolon, but then I pondered and changed it, mainly because I tend to over-use semicolons, so I often reflexively remove them if I stop to think about it. My concern was keeping the second occurance of the word "value" conceptually coupled with the first use of it in the sentence; that's why I didn't use a separate sentence. Do you think a semicolon is better? -- Ian _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"