In message <5209f968.4090...@freebsd.org>, Alexander Motin writes: >On 13.08.2013 11:48, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> I'd like to stir a small (hopefully) discussion (again, hopefully): is EROFS >> appropriate here or would ENODEV be better? >> >> EROFS Read-only filesystem >> ENODEV Operation not supported by device EPERM ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
