On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 4:23:11 am David Chisnall wrote: > On 13 Aug 2013, at 21:57, Jilles Tjoelker <jil...@stack.nl> wrote: > > > Given that JIT is for performance and larger addresses increase code > > size and register pressure, the mmap() flag is probably useful. > > Alternatively, all the JITted code could be placed in one block and use > > relative addressing. > > This would be a good thing to have in for 10.0, as the LLVM 3.4 JIT will > require it unless someone wants to contribute support for the large code > model...
So you just need a flag to cap the virtual address at 2GB? Do you think we need an arbitrary address flag for this, or is a hardcoded 2GB flag ok? Linux has a MAP_32BIT that does what you want I think. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
