On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 02:47:21PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday, June 30, 2014 2:43:42 pm Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > On 06/30/14 20:37, John Baldwin wrote: > > > Reindenting the whitespace made this diff harder to read. Why hasn't this > > > been a problem before on powerpc64? > > > > Hi, > > > > This has not been a problem before, because producers of DATA_SET()'s > > were using syntax along these lines: > > > > static int test2; > > static int test3; > > > > DATA_SET(test, test2); > > DATA_SET(test, test3); > > > > Now if you change this simple code to: > > > > static int test2; > > int test3; > > > > DATA_SET(test, test2); > > DATA_SET(test, test3); > > > > It breaks on powerpc64. Should be very easy to reproduce. > > > > The problem with SYSCTL's is that some are global and some are not. > > Before an indirect pointer was hiding this problem from appearing. > > > > Do you see? Or do you want me to explain more. > > Ahh, ok. Seems odd that this sort of thing would be ppc64-specific however. >
Apparently it isn't and has also has shown up on at least ia64: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31490 Marius _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
