On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:19:00PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
G
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:41:28AM +0000, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Author: bapt
> > Date: Wed Jul 16 11:41:28 2014
> > New Revision: 268750
> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268750
> > 
> > Log:
> >   Sort headers
> >   Constify long options
> >   Remove useless call to sigemptyset
> >   properly check errno when waiting for a process status when a SIGCHLD is 
> > received
> > 
> > Modified:
> >   head/usr.bin/timeout/timeout.c
> > 
> > Modified: head/usr.bin/timeout/timeout.c
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- head/usr.bin/timeout/timeout.c  Wed Jul 16 11:30:04 2014        
> > (r268749)
> > +++ head/usr.bin/timeout/timeout.c  Wed Jul 16 11:41:28 2014        
> > (r268750)
> > @@ -28,20 +28,18 @@
> >  #include <sys/cdefs.h>
> >  __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
> >  
> > -#include <sys/types.h>
> > -#include <sys/time.h>
> > -#include <sys/wait.h>
> > +#include <err.h>
> > +#include <errno.h>
> > +#include <getopt.h>
> >  #include <signal.h>
> > +#include <stdbool.h>
> >  #include <stdio.h>
> >  #include <stdlib.h>
> >  #include <string.h>
> > +#include <sys/time.h>
> > +#include <sys/wait.h>
> >  #include <sysexits.h>
> >  #include <unistd.h>
> > -#include <getopt.h>
> > -#include <err.h>
> > -#include <spawn.h>
> > -#include <errno.h>
> > -#include <stdbool.h>
> This is not proper sorting.  sys/*.h comes first, usermode headers
> second.
> >  
> >  #define EXIT_TIMEOUT 124
> >  
> > @@ -188,7 +186,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
> >     cpid = -1;
> >     pgid = -1;
> >  
> > -   struct option longopts[] = {
> > +   const struct option longopts[] = {
> I noted that this should be static const, not just const.

static const is just not working here. because of the 2 first entries.
> 
> The curious tendency of late is people committing changes without
> getting final confirmation from reviewer. Asking to look at the patch
> before commit would avoid repo churn.

Maybe because the code is sitting on code reviews for a while and that I
adressed all the issue commented there

regards,
Bapt

Attachment: pgpE0s61vq2vN.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to