On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 05:34:29AM +0000, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Author: adrian > Date: Thu Oct 9 05:34:28 2014 > New Revision: 272800 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/272800 > > Log: > Missing from previous commit - keep the VM domain -> PXM mapping > array and use it to map PXM -> VM domain when needed. > > Differential Revision: D906 > Reviewed by: jhb > > Modified: > head/sys/x86/acpica/srat.c > > Modified: head/sys/x86/acpica/srat.c > ============================================================================== > --- head/sys/x86/acpica/srat.c Thu Oct 9 05:33:25 2014 > (r272799) > +++ head/sys/x86/acpica/srat.c Thu Oct 9 05:34:28 2014 > (r272800) > @@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ int num_mem; > static ACPI_TABLE_SRAT *srat; > static vm_paddr_t srat_physaddr; > > +static int vm_domains[VM_PHYSSEG_MAX]; > + > static void srat_walk_table(acpi_subtable_handler *handler, void *arg); > > /* > @@ -247,7 +249,6 @@ check_phys_avail(void) > static int > renumber_domains(void) > { > - int domains[VM_PHYSSEG_MAX]; > int i, j, slot; > > /* Enumerate all the domains. */ > @@ -255,17 +256,17 @@ renumber_domains(void) > for (i = 0; i < num_mem; i++) { > /* See if this domain is already known. */ > for (j = 0; j < vm_ndomains; j++) { > - if (domains[j] >= mem_info[i].domain) > + if (vm_domains[j] >= mem_info[i].domain) > break; > } > - if (j < vm_ndomains && domains[j] == mem_info[i].domain) > + if (j < vm_ndomains && vm_domains[j] == mem_info[i].domain) > continue; > > /* Insert the new domain at slot 'j'. */ > slot = j; > for (j = vm_ndomains; j > slot; j--) > - domains[j] = domains[j - 1]; > - domains[slot] = mem_info[i].domain; > + vm_domains[j] = vm_domains[j - 1]; > + vm_domains[slot] = mem_info[i].domain; > vm_ndomains++; > if (vm_ndomains > MAXMEMDOM) { > vm_ndomains = 1; > @@ -280,15 +281,15 @@ renumber_domains(void) > * If the domain is already the right value, no need > * to renumber. > */ > - if (domains[i] == i) > + if (vm_domains[i] == i) > continue; > > /* Walk the cpu[] and mem_info[] arrays to renumber. */ > for (j = 0; j < num_mem; j++) > - if (mem_info[j].domain == domains[i]) > + if (mem_info[j].domain == vm_domains[i]) > mem_info[j].domain = i; > for (j = 0; j <= MAX_APIC_ID; j++) > - if (cpus[j].enabled && cpus[j].domain == domains[i]) > + if (cpus[j].enabled && cpus[j].domain == vm_domains[i]) > cpus[j].domain = i; > } > KASSERT(vm_ndomains > 0, > @@ -368,4 +369,23 @@ srat_set_cpus(void *dummy) > } > } > SYSINIT(srat_set_cpus, SI_SUB_CPU, SI_ORDER_ANY, srat_set_cpus, NULL); > + > +/* > + * Map a _PXM value to a VM domain ID. > + * > + * Returns the domain ID, or -1 if no domain ID was found. > + */ > +int > +acpi_map_pxm_to_vm_domainid(int pxm) > +{ > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < vm_ndomains; i++) { > + if (vm_domains[i] == pxm) > + return (i); > + } > + > + return (-1); > +} > + > #endif /* MAXMEMDOM > 1 */
I do not like it. Sorry for not looking at the web thing, I have very little time. It never was an intention that one proximity domain reported by ACPI was mapped to single VM domain. VM could split domains (in terms of vm_domains) further for other reasons. Main motivation is that there is 1:1 relations between domain/page queues/page queues locks/pagedaemons. I have patches in WIP stage which split firmware proximity domains further, to decrease congestion on the page queue locks. I wrote about this in the pgsql performance report. The short version is that there is/will be N:1 relation between VM domains and proximity domains (which is reported by ACPI for devices). _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
