> On Oct 9, 2014, at 11:32, Ed Maste <ema...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 9 October 2014 12:43,  <dte...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> 
>> I believe I have observed waxing and waning use of
>> these acronyms, and your recent poll shows a current
>> waning trend; however I wish more commits would:
>> 
>> a. describe the individual action in the message rather
>> than the over-arching, higer-level action
>> b. Use these acronyms more
> 
> I think it's silly to have to manually specify metadata in a commit
> message which is already perfectly captured by the tool itself.  The
> manually-entered metadata is not 100% reliable across the projects
> history anyway.
> 
> That said, I'd be happy to help review a proposed patch to the
> committer's handbook or Subversion primer that documents these terms
> and presents examples of their use.

+1. Seems like a lot of drama over pedanticisms.

Let me dig up the "MFC" script I have when I get home -- it automates the 
entire process.

Thanks!
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to