* John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Maybe I'm flogging a dead horse, but this is 2010. Whether or not a > > compiler supports C99 is no longer an issue. We're already far beyond > > the point of going back to C89. > > The point is that if you look at almost all of the new-bus drivers in the > tree, they do not use C99 initializers to initialize their KOBJ class. > Given that, I do not see a reason to make driver(9) document a style that > almost no drivers use. If we did want to do something different, we > should use the DEFINE_CLASS_0() macro that can be used to declare a KOBJ > class.
That sounds like a good argument. Thanks for explaining! -- Ed Schouten <e...@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgpW4uUjFVicH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
