Edwin Groothuis schrieb am 2010-03-08: > On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 12:16:04AM +0100, Alexander Best wrote: > > could you have another look at the -J option? it seems highlighting > > still
> Aha, only -J in "month only" view is still not working. Will take > care of it later. Also add a bunch of regression tests to it, because > of all of this. > > isn't enabled in combination with it. also i'm wondering what the > > purpose of > > the -b switch is. running `cal` and `ncal -b` seems to be doing the > > very same > > thing (setting flag_backward = 1). > You can't run "cal" until you have installed it, while being able > to run "ncal -b" and coming into "cal" mode is kind of nice. thanks for the hint. the -b switch definitely comes in handy when `cal` isn't available, because one is running ncal from /usr/src/usr.bin. will the -b switch disappear once you ncal/cal works properly with highlighting? what confused me a little is the output of something like `ncal 10 2011`. judging from ncal(1) i guessed the output to be October of 2011, yet the output is all months from October 2011 to September 2012. i tried `ncal -m 10 2011` instead and the output was just the same. so what's the right way to see the entry for lets say October 2011? another issue i'm having is the -m switch in combination with f and p. judging from ncal(1) `ncal -m 3p` should output February 2010 and `ncal -m 3f` April 2010. however instead of printing the previous and next month the previous and next year gets printed. running `ncal -m 10f` on the other hand behaves even weirder because it prints the same as `ncal -m 10`. alex > Edwin _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
