On Monday, July 12, 2010 8:49:39 am Alexander Motin wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > On Sunday, July 11, 2010 12:47:46 pm Alexander Motin wrote: > >> Author: mav > >> Date: Sun Jul 11 16:47:45 2010 > >> New Revision: 209900 > >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209900 > >> > >> Log: > >> Remove interval validation from cpu_tick_calibrate(). As I found, check > >> was needed at preliminary version of the patch, where number of CPU ticks > >> was divided strictly on 16 seconds. Final code instead uses real interval > >> duration, so precise interval should not be important. Same time aliasing > >> issues around second boundary causes false positives, periodically > >> logging > >> useless "t_delta ... too long/short" messages when HZ set below 256. > > > > Hmm, did you ask phk@ about this? > > Yes. He agreed that code should be reconsidered.
Ah, ok. I didn't recall any replies on the list. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
