Dimitry Andric <[email protected]> writes: > Marcel Moolenaar <[email protected]> writes: > > Unbreak xz (liblzma) on strong-aligned architectures (and without > > emulation of misaligned memory accesses). We cannot map the unaligned > > memory access functions to the ones used for aligned accesses, so do > > not define TUKLIB_FAST_UNALIGNED_ACCESS. > Is there no way to define or undefine this per arch? If this particular > define gives a speed advantage on the 'weak-aligned' architectures, it > might be worth it...
Misaligned accesses, especially writes, are slow on all architectures - but Marcel knows this, so I guess he has a reason for doing it this way? DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [email protected] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
