On 19.08.2010 19:20, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message:<4c6d2933.9020...@freebsd.org> Andre Oppermann<an...@freebsd.org> writes: : On 19.08.2010 13:53, Adrian Chadd wrote: :> Author: adrian :> Date: Thu Aug 19 11:53:55 2010 :> New Revision: 211503 :> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211503 :> :> Log: :> Add some initial AR724X chipset support. :> :> This is untested but should at least allow an AR724X to boot. : : Isn't this something that should be done on a project branch and : merged back when in a good working state?We don't have a branch for mips stuff these days. This stuff is OK, since the AR724X is just being rolled out right now... For non AR724x systems, this won't affect anything...
I was more concerned about tree breakage for non-tested code. When developing something bleeding edge it is often useful to just commit some stuff and have it sorted out later. In head this is more dangerous. A small AR724X development branch would be ideal for this. Branching is cheap with SVN these days. -- Andre _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
