On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 03:23:23AM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
A> > --- a/FreeBSD/sys/net/bpf.c
A> > +++ b/FreeBSD/sys/net/bpf.c
A> > @@ -857,7 +857,6 @@ bpf_detachd_locked(struct bpf_d *d, bool detached_ifp)
A> > /* Save bd_writer value */
A> > error = d->bd_writer;
A> > ifp = bp->bif_ifp;
A> > - d->bd_bif = NULL;
A> > if (detached_ifp) {
A> > /*
A> > * Notify descriptor as it's detached, so that any
A> >
A> > Since every bpf_d holds a reference on bpf_if until delayed free happens,
A> > the the bpf_if is going to be valid.
A> >
A> > This allows not to use epoch_wait and run fully async. The patch above is
A> > a minimal patch: with NULL assignment removed, several more pieces of code
A> > can be removed in bpf.c
A> >
A> > Of course your patch also is going to work, but what do you think:
A> > are there any landmines with fully async approach?
A>
A> Hi,
A>
A> bpf_mtap() is not the only consumer of bd_bif, some of them expect it
A> becomes NULL when descriptor is detached.
May be then make a flag attached/detached?
--
Gleb Smirnoff
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
