16.01.2020 4:41, Ed Maste wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 16:10, Eugene Grosbein <eu...@grosbein.net> wrote: >> >> There are multiple scenarios there ZFS may be sub-optimal at least: small >> i386 virtual guests >> or 32-bit only hardware like AMD Geode, or big amd64 SSD-only systems with >> bhyve and multiple guests >> that need lots of memory and should not fight with ZFS for RAM etc. > > That may well be the case, but our defaults should represent the > configuration that's desirable to the largest set of users, and IMO > that's ZFS in most cases today. > > It might be that we should default to UFS on i386 and ZFS on amd64?
UFS may be better for any virtual guest having RAM less or equal to 4GB. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
