On 8/17/20 01:22, Mark Millard wrote: > For the c99's that were removed: why were they not > gnu99's originally? If there is a reason, why is > it now okay to revert to gnu99 instead of sticking > with c99?
gnu99 was made default in 2009, most of these "c99" cases predates that and should be converted at that time. Cheers,
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
