On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 03:39:27PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> With the recent libobjc removal this means that we can compile
> all (no exceptions) of FreeBSD/{i386,amd64} with clang.
>
> Quite a milestone in my opinion :)Great news! Thanks for all the work to make this happen! Has boot2 been submitted to LLVM as a clang regression test? Thanks, Brooks > > On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:13:08PM +0000, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > Author: dim > > Date: Mon May 2 21:13:08 2011 > > New Revision: 221348 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/221348 > > > > Log: > > Clang r130700 can now compile sys/boot/i386/boot2 with room to spare. > > > > Modified: > > head/sys/boot/i386/boot2/Makefile > > > > Modified: head/sys/boot/i386/boot2/Makefile > > ============================================================================== > > --- head/sys/boot/i386/boot2/Makefile Mon May 2 21:10:13 2011 > > (r221347) > > +++ head/sys/boot/i386/boot2/Makefile Mon May 2 21:13:08 2011 > > (r221348) > > @@ -2,9 +2,6 @@ > > > > .include <bsd.own.mk> > > > > -# XXX: clang can compile the boot code just fine, but boot2 gets too big > > -CC:=${CC:C/^(.*\/)?clang$/gcc/1} > > - > > FILES= boot boot1 boot2 > > > > NM?= nm > > @@ -45,6 +42,12 @@ CFLAGS= -Os \ > > -Wpointer-arith -Wshadow -Wstrict-prototypes -Wwrite-strings \ > > -Winline --param max-inline-insns-single=100 > > > > +.if ${CC:T:Mclang} == "clang" > > +CFLAGS+= -mllvm -stack-alignment=8 -mllvm -inline-threshold=3 > > +# XXX: clang integrated-as doesn't grok .codeNN directives yet > > +CFLAGS+= ${.IMPSRC:T:Mboot1.S:C/^.+$/-no-integrated-as/} > > +.endif > > + > > LDFLAGS=-static -N --gc-sections > > > > # Pick up ../Makefile.inc early. >
pgpkA7GMjKc5Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
