Pawel Jakub Dawidek <p...@freebsd.org> writes: > My personal opinion is that supporting such configuration is not worth > the efforts and actually I'd prefer to use the same sysctl tree > (vfs.nfs.*) and the same fstype (nfs) in both clients. User would decide > which to use by loading one kernel module or the other.
Precisely what I was trying to say. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
