On May 22, 2011, at 3:30 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 10:22:56PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: >> The problem here is deeper in my opinion. What FreeBSD calls >> amd64 the rest of the world (ie. linux) calls x86_64, I think >> that instead of this we should teach llvm/clang about "amd64". >> Maybe as a FreeBSD-only diff. > > If we move away from "amd64", we are going to need a _substantial_ amount > of work on ports.
Yea. That's why I think, although I'd like to move away from it, we're stuck with amd64 for both MACHINE and MACHINE_ARCH for quite some time. In that case, we'll just have to configure clang the same way we configure gcc with the x86_64 monicker. Warner _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
