On 10/30/11 9:25 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 09:17:42PM +0000, Marius Strobl wrote:
Author: marius
Date: Sun Oct 30 21:17:42 2011
New Revision: 226947
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/226947
Log:
- Use device_t rather than the NetBSDish struct device.
Hmm, I though that style(9) advises against this practice:
Avoid using typedefs for structure types. Typedefs are problematic
because they do not properly hide their underlying type; [...]
When convention requires a typedef, make its name match the struct tag.
Avoid typedefs ending in _t, except as specified in Standard C or by
POSIX.
Does these rules not apply for struct device for some reason?
./danfe
I agree we should be trying to get rid of the blah_t horrors. I think
this went the wrong direction.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
