On 17 Nov 2011, at 14:31, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >>>> Kinda gross but "FBSD-9.0-RELEASE-amd64-amd64-bootonly.iso"? >>> >>> Can't we use one if they are equal? >> >> I'd prefer consistency. [...] > > But it looks so plain stupid!
I've had someone ask me what amd64-amd64 meant when I pointed them as the RC announcement. I replied that I had no idea and suggested that possibly RE had been handed over to the department of redundancy department. Having read this thread, I can now confidently say... that I still have no idea. But (with my compiler-writer hat on) please tell me that we're not inventing yet another incompatible form of target triple. We have at least twice as many as we need already... David_______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
