On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 06:38:05PM +0000, Garrett Wollman wrote:
G> Author: wollman
G> Date: Tue Oct  2 18:38:05 2012
G> New Revision: 241140
G> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/241140
G> 
G> Log:
G>   Fix spelling of the function name in two assertion messages.
G> 
G> Modified:
G>   head/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c
G> 
G> Modified: head/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c
G> 
==============================================================================
G> --- head/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c      Tue Oct  2 17:46:32 2012        
(r241139)
G> +++ head/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c      Tue Oct  2 18:38:05 2012        
(r241140)
G> @@ -995,9 +995,9 @@ sosend_dgram(struct socket *so, struct s
G>      int atomic = sosendallatonce(so) || top;
G>  #endif
G>  
G> -    KASSERT(so->so_type == SOCK_DGRAM, ("sodgram_send: !SOCK_DGRAM"));
G> +    KASSERT(so->so_type == SOCK_DGRAM, ("sosend_dgram: !SOCK_DGRAM"));
G>      KASSERT(so->so_proto->pr_flags & PR_ATOMIC,
G> -        ("sodgram_send: !PR_ATOMIC"));
G> +        ("sosend_dgram: !PR_ATOMIC"));
G>  
G>      if (uio != NULL)
G>              resid = uio->uio_resid;

Why not to use just __func__ here?

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to