On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 06:38:05PM +0000, Garrett Wollman wrote: G> Author: wollman G> Date: Tue Oct 2 18:38:05 2012 G> New Revision: 241140 G> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/241140 G> G> Log: G> Fix spelling of the function name in two assertion messages. G> G> Modified: G> head/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c G> G> Modified: head/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c G> ============================================================================== G> --- head/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c Tue Oct 2 17:46:32 2012 (r241139) G> +++ head/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c Tue Oct 2 18:38:05 2012 (r241140) G> @@ -995,9 +995,9 @@ sosend_dgram(struct socket *so, struct s G> int atomic = sosendallatonce(so) || top; G> #endif G> G> - KASSERT(so->so_type == SOCK_DGRAM, ("sodgram_send: !SOCK_DGRAM")); G> + KASSERT(so->so_type == SOCK_DGRAM, ("sosend_dgram: !SOCK_DGRAM")); G> KASSERT(so->so_proto->pr_flags & PR_ATOMIC, G> - ("sodgram_send: !PR_ATOMIC")); G> + ("sosend_dgram: !PR_ATOMIC")); G> G> if (uio != NULL) G> resid = uio->uio_resid;
Why not to use just __func__ here? -- Totus tuus, Glebius. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"