On 5 May 2013, at 19:31, Andrey Chernov <a...@freebsd.org> wrote: > It is better to fix this function return type to match POSIX standard > rather than to document its non-standard behavior. We try to follow > POSIX when possible and this is the case.
We follow Darwin in this case, which returns 0 on success or -1 on error. 'Fixing' this will break code written for Darwin and testing the return value. Not fixing it will not break POSIX code that ignores the (unexpected) return value. David _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
