On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, David Chisnall wrote:
> +static __inline int
> +__inline_isnan(double __x)
> +{
> +
> +     return (__x != __x);
> +}
> +
> +static __inline int
> +__inline_isnanf(float __x)
> +{
> +
> +     return (__x != __x);
> +}
> +
> +static __inline int
> +__inline_isnanl(long double __x)
> +{
> +
> +     return (__x != __x);
> +}

This has already been covered at greater length, but I believe
this part is incorrect.  Relational operators can raise an invalid
exception when one of the arguments is a NaN -- even a quiet NaN.
Raising an exception is optional in C99 (7.12.14) and required in
IEEE-754... in practice, it tends to be platform- and compiler-
specific.

That is the whole reason the is* macros are defined by the
standard in the first place, and also why we didn't use the
trivial implementation above.  The is* macros are required to not
raise an exception.

P.S. It would be great if clang implemented the FENV_ACCESS pragma
and provided an intrinsic that produced a fast inline isnan() when
the pragma is off, and the full, correct one when the pragma is on.
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to