Remko Lodder <[email protected]> wrote in <[email protected]>:
re> re> Hi Hiroki, re> re> On Oct 10, 2013, at 11:32 AM, Hiroki Sato <[email protected]> wrote: re> re> > Author: hrs re> > Date: Thu Oct 10 09:32:27 2013 re> > New Revision: 256256 re> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/256256 re> > re> > Log: re> > - Update rc.d/jail to use a jail(8) configuration file instead of re> > command line options. The "jail_<jname>_*" rc.conf(5) variables for re> > per-jail configuration are automatically converted to re> > /var/run/jail.<jname>.conf before the jail(8) utility is invoked. re> > This is transparently backward compatible. re> > re> > - Fix a minor bug in jail(8) which prevented it from returning false re> > when jail -r failed. re> > re> re> Thanks for doing such a massive update. However it seems to break the re> ezjail utility. re> My jails didn't restart after I upgraded to the most recent -head re> version re> re> FreeBSD nakur.elvandar.org 10.0-ALPHA6 FreeBSD 10.0-ALPHA6 #7 r256311: re> Fri Oct 11 13:27:54 CEST 2013 re> [email protected]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NAKUR amd64 re> re> If I replace this with an older version, the utility starts and re> complains about certain things not being done properly. The re> system does not mount devfs nodes anylonger and thus is basically out re> of function. re> re> I was not expecting this much fallout from this change, others that re> will be upgrading will loose the ability to start their jails until re> they can re> resolve this by hand. Can you send me your ezjail configuration and differences of the results (error messages, mount handling, etc) between old and new rc.d/jail? -- Hiroki
pgpzuZPZs_XJm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
