On 12/04/13 11:41, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 04:38:41PM +0000, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
Author: nwhitehorn
Date: Wed Dec 4 16:38:40 2013
New Revision: 258928
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/258928
Log:
Rename sysctl kern.supported_abis to kern.supported_archs, since it gives
the set of MACHINE_ARCH values that can be run.
Modified:
head/sys/kern/kern_mib.c
Modified: head/sys/kern/kern_mib.c
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/kern/kern_mib.c Wed Dec 4 16:06:23 2013 (r258927)
+++ head/sys/kern/kern_mib.c Wed Dec 4 16:38:40 2013 (r258928)
@@ -261,11 +261,11 @@ sysctl_hw_machine_arch(SYSCTL_HANDLER_AR
SYSCTL_PROC(_hw, HW_MACHINE_ARCH, machine_arch, CTLTYPE_STRING | CTLFLAG_RD,
NULL, 0, sysctl_hw_machine_arch, "A", "System architecture");
-SYSCTL_STRING(_kern, OID_AUTO, supported_abis, CTLFLAG_RD | CTLFLAG_MPSAFE,
+SYSCTL_STRING(_kern, OID_AUTO, supported_archs, CTLFLAG_RD | CTLFLAG_MPSAFE,
#ifdef COMPAT_FREEBSD32
- MACHINE_ARCH " " MACHINE_ARCH32, 0, "List of supported ABIs");
+ MACHINE_ARCH " " MACHINE_ARCH32, 0, "Supported architectures for
binaries");
#else
- MACHINE_ARCH, 0, "List of supported ABIs");
+ MACHINE_ARCH, 0, "Supported architectures for binaries");
#endif
Solaris called the same concept an ISA, as far as I remember.
You do not intend to list foreign systems ABI emulators there ?
The idea is to have something purely the same in meaning as
hw.machine_arch, which does not involve listing foreign ABIs and is also
why it is "arch" instead of "isa" (since it is "machine_arch"). I'm
happy to rename it again if there is a clear consensus, though, although
there is some risk of bikeshedding. I personally have no opinion on what
it is called so long as it exists.
-Nathan
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
