On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Gleb Smirnoff <gleb...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Third. As you already know, there is projects/pf branch, where Nicos > is getting things right wrt pf+VIMAGE. The patches should first go > to this branch and tested in it. Committing to head (even a good > code), you are creating conflicts for Nicos. You are fixing two > particular problems that hurt you, while Nicos tries to get things > right in general, for everyones sake. My approach on taskqueue > context (that was rejected by Marko), was also an attempt to > create a good and generic way of dealing with the problem. Unfortunately, > Marko didn't suggest good alternatives. > > Gleb, Much thanks to you and Nicos for working on pf + VIMAGE. I work on FreeNAS at iXsystems, and in FreeNAS we enable VIMAGE, because we use jails quiet heavily. I encouraged Martin to go with his patch, because it seemed to solve some problems we had with pf + VIMAGE kernel panics such as this one: https://bugs.freenas.org/issues/4153 Do you have a rough idea when you and Nicos will be ready to merge your projects/pf branch to HEAD? Would you be open to forking the https://github.com/trueos repository on github and putting your pf + VIMAGE patches in there? We could make special builds of FreeNAS and aggressively test your VIMAGE patches. FreeNAS isn't based on FreeBSD CURRENT/FreeBSD 10 yet..... we have some work to do to get up to there. Thanks. -- Craig _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
