On Aug 21, 2014, at 10:31 PM, Neel Natu <neeln...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Warner, > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Warner Losh <i...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> Author: imp >> Date: Wed Aug 20 22:58:12 2014 >> New Revision: 270249 >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/270249 >> >> Log: >> Turns out that IDENTIFY DEVICE and IDENTIFY PACKET DEVICE return data >> that's only mostly similar. Specifically word 78 bits are defined for >> IDENTIFY DEVICE as >> 5 Supports Hardware Feature Control >> while a IDENTIFY PACKET DEVICE defines them as >> 5 Asynchronous notification supported >> Therefore, only pay attention to bit 5 when we're talking to ATAPI >> devices (we don't use the hardware feature control at this time). >> Ignore it for ATA devices. Remove kludge that papered over this issue >> for Samsung SATA SSDs, since Micron drives also have the bit set and >> the error was caused by this bad interpretation of the spec (which is >> quite easy to do, since bits aren't normally overlapping like this). >> >> Modified: >> head/sys/cam/ata/ata_xpt.c >> >> Modified: head/sys/cam/ata/ata_xpt.c >> ============================================================================== >> --- head/sys/cam/ata/ata_xpt.c Wed Aug 20 22:39:26 2014 (r270248) >> +++ head/sys/cam/ata/ata_xpt.c Wed Aug 20 22:58:12 2014 (r270249) >> @@ -458,12 +458,18 @@ negotiate: >> 0, 0x02); >> break; >> case PROBE_SETAN: >> - /* Remember what transport thinks about AEN. */ >> - if (softc->caps & CTS_SATA_CAPS_H_AN) >> + /* >> + * Only ATAPI defines this bit to mean AEN, but remember >> + * what transport thinks about AEN. >> + */ >> + if ((softc->caps & CTS_SATA_CAPS_H_AN) && >> + periph->path->device->protocol == PROTO_ATAPI) >> path->device->inq_flags |= SID_AEN; >> else >> path->device->inq_flags &= ~SID_AEN; >> xpt_async(AC_GETDEV_CHANGED, path, NULL); >> + if (periph->path->device->protocol != PROTO_ATAPI) >> + break; >> cam_fill_ataio(ataio, >> 1, >> probedone, >> @@ -750,14 +756,6 @@ out: >> goto noerror; >> >> /* >> - * Some Samsung SSDs report supported Asynchronous >> Notification, >> - * but return ABORT on attempt to enable it. >> - */ >> - } else if (softc->action == PROBE_SETAN && >> - status == CAM_ATA_STATUS_ERROR) { >> - goto noerror; >> - >> - /* >> * SES and SAF-TE SEPs have different IDENTIFY commands, >> * but SATA specification doesn't tell how to identify them. >> * Until better way found, just try another if first fail. >> > > This change causes a panic for me on boot. Here is the boot log: > > ahci0: <Intel Patsburg AHCI SATA controller> port > 0xf050-0xf057,0xf040-0xf043,0xf030-0xf037,0xf020-0xf023,0xf000-0xf01f > mem 0xfbb21000-0xfbb217ff irq 18 at device 31.2 on pci0 > ahci0: AHCI v1.30 with 6 6Gbps ports, Port Multiplier not supported > ahcich0: <AHCI channel> at channel 0 on ahci0 > ahcich1: <AHCI channel> at channel 1 on ahci0 > ahcich2: <AHCI channel> at channel 2 on ahci0 > ahcich3: <AHCI channel> at channel 3 on ahci0 > ahcich4: <AHCI channel> at channel 4 on ahci0 > ahcich5: <AHCI channel> at channel 5 on ahci0 > ahciem0: <AHCI enclosure management bridge> on ahci0 > ... > xpt_action_default: CCB type 0xdeadc0de not supported > ... > run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 60 seconds for xpt_config > run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 120 seconds for xpt_config > run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 180 seconds for xpt_config > run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 240 seconds for xpt_config > run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 300 seconds for xpt_config > panic: run_interrupt_driven_config_hooks: waited too long > cpuid = 0 > KDB: stack backtrace: > db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0xffffffff81d92920 > kdb_backtrace() at kdb_backtrace+0x39/frame 0xffffffff81d929d0 > vpanic() at vpanic+0x189/frame 0xffffffff81d92a50 > kassert_panic() at kassert_panic+0x139/frame 0xffffffff81d92ac0 > boot_run_interrupt_driven_config_hooks() at > boot_run_interrupt_driven_config_hooks+0x111/frame 0xffffffff81d92b50 > mi_startup()fffff81d92b70 > btext() at btext+0x2c > KDB: enter: panic > [ thread pid 0 tid 100000 ] > Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3e: movq $0,kdb_why > db> > > The peripheral in question is a SATA attached CDROM: > > % camcontrol devlist > <INTEL SSDSC2CW240A3 400i> at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,ada0) > <ATAPI iHAS524 C LL23> at scbus2 target 0 lun 0 (cd0,pass1) > <WDC WD1000CHTZ-04JCPV0 04.06A00> at scbus3 target 0 lun 0 (pass2,ada1) > <Corsair Neutron GTX SSD M306> at scbus4 target 0 lun 0 (pass3,ada2) > <AHCI SGPIO Enclosure 1.00 0001> at scbus6 target 0 lun 0 (ses0,pass4) > > pass1 at ahcich2 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0 > pass1: <ATAPI iHAS524 C LL23> Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device > pass1: Serial Number 3524472 2N8225501140 > pass1: 150.000MB/s transfers (SATA 1.x, UDMA5, ATAPI 12bytes, PIO 8192bytes) > > The following patch fixes the panic. > > Index: sys/cam/ata/ata_xpt.c > =================================================================== > --- sys/cam/ata/ata_xpt.c (revision 270249) > +++ sys/cam/ata/ata_xpt.c (working copy) > @@ -468,7 +468,8 @@ > else > path->device->inq_flags &= ~SID_AEN; > xpt_async(AC_GETDEV_CHANGED, path, NULL); > - if (periph->path->device->protocol != PROTO_ATAPI) > + if (periph->path->device->protocol != PROTO_ATAPI && > + periph->path->device->protocol != PROTO_SCSI) > break; > cam_fill_ataio(ataio, > 1,
I think the more proper test is == PROTO_ATA elsewhere, since that’s what distinguishes the ATA_IDENTIFY from the ATAPI_IDENTIFY. > However, there seem to be a couple of issues with the original patch: > > 1. The 'periph->path->device->protocol' is not initialized to > PROTO_ATAPI anywhere in the tree so the not-equal-to test is a no-op. We test here to determine which identify command to send: if (periph->path->device->protocol == PROTO_ATA) ata_28bit_cmd(ataio, ATA_ATA_IDENTIFY, 0, 0, 0); else ata_28bit_cmd(ataio, ATA_ATAPI_IDENTIFY, 0, 0, 0); and that is working to send the right command. > 2. It seems not right to break out of switch in 'probestart()' without > providing a way for 'probedone()' to be called. I believe that this > stops the state machine from making forward progress and results in > 'xpt_config()' not completing. That’s a problem, you’re right. Let me rework. > If you need more information to debug this some more or test a proper > fix then I am happy to help. Please try the one included here. I think it will address things. I’ve tried it on one system, and am trying it on others in parallel to sending this. Warner
ata-xpt-patch
Description: Binary data
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail