> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-src-committ...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-src- > committ...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Hiroki Sato > Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 8:38 PM > To: cperc...@freebsd.org > Cc: src-committ...@freebsd.org; svn-src-...@freebsd.org; svn-src- > h...@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r272393 - head/etc > > Colin Percival <cperc...@freebsd.org> wrote > in <542caabb.5090...@freebsd.org>: > > cp> On 10/01/14 18:16, Hiroki Sato wrote: > cp> > This is an attempt to solve a problem that rc.d scripts from third-party > cp> > software do not have entries in /etc/defaults/rc.conf. > cp> > cp> Isn't this why we have the > cp> > : ${foo_enable="NO"} > cp> idiom in ports rc.d files? > cp> > cp> > The fact that > cp> > load_rc_config() reads rc.conf only once and /etc/rc invokes the > function > cp> > before running rc.d scripts made developers confused for a long time > because > cp> > load_rc_config() just before run_rc_command() in each rc.d script > overrides > cp> > variables only when the script is directly invoked, not from /etc/rc. > cp> > cp> If a script is setting variables for its own use, there's no need to use > cp> functions from rc.subr -- it can just set the variables directly. If a > cp> script is editing rc.conf, sending a SIGALRM to $$ will signal /etc/rc to > cp> re-source rc.conf. > cp> > cp> I'm really not clear on what this commit accomplishes. > > The primary purpose is to make it clear which variables are used in > the script for *user configuration* and provide a consistent writing > style for scripts from both base and ports. More specifically, I > want to implement a way to list user-configurable variables and which > one is changed from the default value, by effectively replacing > functionality of defaults/rc.conf with set_rcvar(). > > Use of : ${foo="NO"} idiom after load_rc_config() works as you > pointed out. However, it does not work with listing variables. > Plus, there are many scripts written in an inconsistent way. Some > scripts call load_rc_config() multiple times, some have the idioms > between load_rc_config() and run_rc_command(), and some have them > mistakenly before load_rc_config(). I think this is due to confusion > about how load_rc_config() works and all of them can be > fixed/rewritten consistently of course, but I think gathering > definitions at the head of the scripts and making them being defined > at the end of load_rc_config() as set_rcvar_obsolete() does are more > intuitive. >
I'm going to chime in here. I'm equally befuddled because for years (properly understanding load_rc_config()) would just create a file under /etc/rc.conf.d/. There's your stand-in for /etc/defaults/rc.conf right there; a file in the little-known and even less talked-about /etc/rc.conf.d/ directory -- where I believe you it is that one precisely does what it is you're looking for (based on your description). -- Devin _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"