True, it's not actually odd, it's just surprising the first time one comes across it.
Also, I goofed in the text: >> With the flexible array, (sizeof(struct uma_cache)) is going to be >> 32 bytes smaller than without it. It's `struct uma_zone` that shrinks by (potentially) more than one would expect. (The uma_cache struct is itself 32 bytes and is not changed, so the args.size value should be the same -- implying that some OTHER "sizeof(struct uma_zone)" is where things are going wrong.) Chris _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
