Ed Schouten wrote this message on Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:24 +0200:
> Maybe it would make more sense to just remove this manual page?
>
> It looks like there are already some pieces of code in our source tree
> that use _Static_assert(), which is good. Maybe it would be better to
> to leave CTASSERT() undocumented, so that it becomes less likely that
> new code uses this interface.
I plan on documenting _Static_assert, and once that is documented
for both userland and kernel, then we can mark this deprecated...
Do we support linking man pages between man3/man9? or should it just
be in a comment? and in one section?
--
John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579
"All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
