Bryan Drewery <bdrew...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > But wouldn't that imply that /usr/src/share/mk is the right set of > > makefiles to use for /usr/src/ports/ > > > > What would you consider the right sys.mk etc would be in such a case? > > > > For our case we want the checked in src/share/mk to be used rather than
Are you refering to a src/share/mk which is sibling to src/ports/* or something else? Because with MAKESYSPATH=.../share/mk src/share/mk/sys.mk is what you should find. > the older /usr/share/mk as it is easier to support. If there's a problem > we fix in our local.sys.env.mk or bsd.port.mk for instance, it will be > used by updating the checkout. This was something we backported, > without the src.conf inclusion in sys.mk, and were running with fine. I might be confused... It might help to differentiate the question of finding the right sys.mk which IMO is critical to a happy outcome, from what to do with src.* if present. Normally anything under $SRCTOP should be subject to src.* - by definition. But there's no reason you cannot make exceptions - by (as I think you already mentioned) adding a check for $SRCTOP/ports in local*sys*mk to suppress src.conf at least. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
