On 10/30/15 08:41, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:28:51 +0100
Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/29/15 15:36, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
The LinuxKPI is not a binary compatibility module, and will at some
H> point have API's diverging from Linux, to fit BSD API's better.
This statement makes the name of LinuxKPI quite pointless, as well
as the whole idea of the KPI unclear.
Hi,
To be more clear. Adding bind_irq_to_cpu() is more an exception than the
default. A the moment I think Linux doesn't have an equivalent of this
function, because of Linux's interrupt model.
My question is whether a "normal" FreeBSD user has any reason to
enable LinuxKPI now or in the future.
Hi,
If drivers which depend on this feature are KLD's there's no reason to
enable this by default in GENERIC. The current and future clients of
LINUXKPI will possibly be KLD's and then MODULE_DEPEND() will do the
magic behind the scenes. Was this your question?
--HPS
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
