And I disagree here Hans You don’t need that and it just adds more into the callout system that is not needed.
R On Nov 10, 2015, at 9:59 AM, Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/10/15 15:49, Randall Stewart wrote: >> +#define callout_async_drain(c, d) \ >> + _callout_stop_safe(c, 0, d) > > Hi, > > Like commented in D4076, I think the callout_async_drain() function should > take a second void pointer argument, which is passed to the drain function, > instead of re-using the pointer argument passed to callout_reset(), because > that will make many to one, N:1, asynchronous drain possible. > > --HPS -------- Randall Stewart [email protected] 803-317-4952 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
