On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:19:04PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > For MSDOS it's one thing and likely helps. But for ufs it doesn't > help. Soft updates already does an excellent job at reducing wear and > all async does is give added danger of dataloss. Linux distros don't > matter for UFS because different design decisions have been made for > ext[234] and UFS.
SU mount of UFS and unexpected media loast can caused kernel panic at next mount this media. async mount don't have such issuse. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
