On 17 Dec 2016, at 10:43, Ed Schouten <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2016-12-16 23:55 GMT+01:00 Dimitry Andric <[email protected]>: >> Since this now causes VMware kernel modules to insta-panic the kernel, >> it might be nice to put some warning in UPDATING, at least. Luckily >> __FreeBSD_version got bumped by Adrian in r310149 for something >> unrelated, but this is definitely something to notify maintainers of >> ports (with kernel modules) about too. > > This change affects the KBI, as sysctl declarations now include an > additional pointer. The underlying sysctl registration function also > gained an additional argument. That said, if you simply rebuild all > kernel modules, this shouldn't cause any regressions, or are you > saying those persist? If so, this is definitely not an intended > side-effect of this change and we should look into it.
Well, the kernel module doesn't compile anymore, of course:
os.c:894:46: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 11, have 10
BALLOON_NAME_VERBOSE);
^
/usr/src/sys/sys/sysctl.h:1014:1: note: 'sysctl_add_oid' declared here
struct sysctl_oid *sysctl_add_oid(struct sysctl_ctx_list *clist,
^
1 error generated.
I am unsure why the VMware modules don't use the SYSCTL_XXX macros.
Maybe these were not available in the past? Only the original
maintainers might know.
In any case, I have submitted a PR with a build fix, making use of the
unrelated __FreeBSD_version bump, to add an additional NULL parameter
to the call:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/215353
-Dimitry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
