In message <868tne3rfh....@desk.des.no>, =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav? = w rites: > Cy Schubert <cy.schub...@komquats.com> writes: > > Dag-Erling Smørgrav <d...@des.no> writes: > > > Could you please revert? > > Sure, it's been reverted. > > No, you misunderstood... I meant revert *my* commit. I didn't know it > had already been fixed (for some value of fixed) when I wrote this.
It's reverted now. > > > Are you thinking of a more intrusive change like my first draft of the > > patch? > > Sorry, haven't looked at your patch. Mine adds check_debug, check_force > etc. and uses them everywhere. > > Note that none of these variables are documented, so using them outside > of rc.subr itself is arguably a bug. Agreed. Regardless, an UPDATING entry will still be needed because ports and third party software may have the same "bug" as rc.d/dhclient and rc.d/bgfsck. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <cy.schub...@cschubert.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <c...@freebsd.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
