On 17/05/2018 14:27, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
OK ... I meant generally you can. The catch here is that the change was
already upstream so it should have been done in the vendor area and then
merged. It's best to fix this properly now.
On Thu, 17 May 2018 14:20:05 -0500
Pedro Giffuni <p...@freebsd.org> wrote:
On 17/05/2018 14:12, Matthew Macy wrote:
How do I avoid problems while allowing timely updates?
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Emmanuel Vadot <m...@bidouilliste.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2018 18:14:10 +0000 (UTC)
Matt Macy <mm...@freebsd.org> wrote:
Date: Thu May 17 18:14:10 2018
New Revision: 333745
ck: add support for executing callbacks outside of main poll loop
Pull in change from upstream deca119d14bfffd440770eb67cbdbeaf7b57eb7b
| ck_epoch: introduce ck_epoch_deferred
| Allow for deferral to occur outside epoch poll critical loop (which
may access per-CPU structures).
Approved by: sbruno
CK was imported in vendor-sys/ck, commiting directly into head will
cause some problems in the future.
Actually ... committing to head is fine: some things just have to be fixed.
This is not true, it can cause a lot of problems with futures updates
if the change isn't in the vendor repo.
Sorry for misguiding.
We do ask you try to upstream the change and re-merge things when possible.
This is already upstream, Matt is just updating CK with a patch he did
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"