> On Jan 21, 2016, at 18:25, Gleb Smirnoff <gleb...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 05:18:28AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > S> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov <s...@zxy.spb.ru> > wrote: > S> > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:10:44PM +0000, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > S> > > > S> > >> Author: glebius > S> > >> Date: Thu Jan 7 23:10:44 2016 > S> > >> New Revision: 293391 > S> > >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/293391 > S> > >> > S> > >> Log: > S> > >> Merge r293282 from head: > S> > >> Provide knob NO_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS. If defined, extra kernels in > KERNCONF > S> > >> won't be installed, only the first one would. > S> > >> > S> > >> Turn NO_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS=yes on stable/10 to preserve original > S> > >> behaviour of not installing additional kernels built. > S> > > > S> > > What?! > S> > > By default additional kernels built will be installed. > S> > > S> > Agreed, but they would overwrite one another, unless you used > S> > INSTKERNNAME appropriately. > S> > S> I am use relese.sh with KERNEL="GENEROC VSTREAM" and nothing > S> overwritied. > S> INSTKERNNAME properly used with KERNCONF by Makefile.inc1 > S> (kernel for first and kernel.${_kernel} for other. > S> > S> Now relese.sh can't used with multiple kernels, this is POLA > S> violation. > > You are confusing release.sh with regular build. Now in head regular > build behaves same as release.sh. But in stable/10 NO_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS=1 > to provide old behaviour.
It should be ?=, not = then? Now it's always on.. Thanks, -NGie _______________________________________________ svn-src-stable-10@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-stable-10 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-stable-10-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"