Author: crossley
Date: Fri Feb 10 03:20:04 2006
New Revision: 376636
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=376636&view=rev
Log:
Update
Modified:
forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060210-log.txt
Modified: forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060210-log.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060210-log.txt?rev=376636&r1=376635&r2=376636&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060210-log.txt (original)
+++ forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060210-log.txt Fri Feb 10 03:20:04 2006
@@ -117,3 +117,50 @@
[21:14] xley: okay i will go any fix that aspect
[21:15] rgardler: I only see "dev" in the context of Forrest core version
numbers so we seem to agree
[21:16] rgardler: Going to clean zeph, back in 10 mnutes, then on with FOR-711
(LM caching)
+[22:01] xley: Ross, when you are back, i would like to have a talk about
plugin deployment.
+[22:01] rgardler: I'm back - give me a few minutes to write some notes on
what I have discovered re FOR-711 - 2 minutes
+[22:02] xley: k
+[22:05] _Gav_: Ive been out, back to work on Pelt theme, should I work
directly in plugin directory on this, or deploy it to a test site
+[22:05] _Gav_: What concerns has cheche with this
+[22:05] xley: do both
+[22:06] _Gav_: ok cheers
+[22:06] xley: cheche might be back later today.
+[22:06] _Gav_: ok
+[22:10] rgardler: OK, David, fire away
+[22:11] xley: about plugin deployment ...
+[22:11] xley: we have talked about this once before (cannot yet find it)
+[22:12] xley: anyway ...
+[22:12] xley: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/foârrest/site/plugins/
+[22:12] xley: I presume that the 0.8-dev directory is a mistake caused by
+[22:12] xley: the badly named version numbers in the plugins/*/build.xml files.
+[22:12] xley: Fixed now so i suppose that can be removed.
+[22:12] xley: ...
+[22:13] rgardler: No...
+[22:13] xley: tell me
+[22:13] rgardler: I think we may have been at cross-purposes earlier
+[22:13] rgardler: I was talking about -dev extension to plugin names
+[22:13] rgardler: were you talking about -dev on the forrest version?
+[22:14] xley: i also about -dev extension to plugin names ...
+[22:14] rgardler: OK
+[22:14] xley: the -dev on the forrest version is related ...
+[22:14] rgardler: So the 0.8-dev directory is the Forrest core version
+[22:14] rgardler: when we release 0.8 that becomes 0.8 (loses the -dev)
+[22:14] xley: because that is where the end up being deployed, gotta get
both right.
+[22:15] rgardler: Can we remove the confusion? Just drop -dev in both cases?
+[22:15] » twilliams_ joined the chat room.
+[22:15] xley: that is what i wondered too
+[22:15] rgardler: I think we can... some background...
+[22:16] rgardler: I used the -dev extension (for core) so it matched what is
in the docs
+[22:16] rgardler: So, dropping it will make it the *only* place we don't use
-dev
+[22:16] rgardler: But will simplify the release process
+[22:17] xley: so what are the zips at the top-level then?
+[22:17] rgardler: The top level zips are the current dev version
+[22:18] rgardler: I think it is a throw back to pre-versioned plugins
+[22:18] rgardler: would have to verify the download process
+[22:18] rgardler: we should be able to lose them now
+[22:18] rgardler: No.. just remembered
+[22:19] xley: :-) glad that we are talking about it
+[22:19] rgardler: if you specificy a dev version (-dev)
+[22:19] rgardler: it will (used to?) always use the unversioned top level pugin
+[22:19] xley:
http://casa.che-che.com/~bot/forreâst/forrest.log.10Feb2006
+[22:19] rgardler: thus it made no difference what forrest core version you
used
