On 2010-10-05 20:55, Max Bowsher wrote: > On 05/10/10 13:53, Michael Diers wrote: >> Peter Samuelson has submitted Subversion 1.6.12dfsg-2 to Debian >> unstable. >> >> https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/subversion/1.6.12dfsg-2 >> >> The package will soon transition to Debian testing and eventually get >> collected in bzr branch lp:debian/squeeze/subversion. >> >> This release primarily addresses CVE-2010-3315. Is anyone (Max?) >> planning to merge this into our Lucid PPA? Otherwise I'll happily do >> that, and also update the other supported branches. > > I'm happy to do so. Or you can. I don't mind. But, it's time for us to > add a Maverick package, so whoever does should include that/
Right, I'm still slightly insecure when it comes to applying the tools correctly, so I may have to double-check with this list before actually causing havoc. Unless that's a problem, I'd like to give it a go. >> https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subversion >> >> lp:~svn/ubuntu/lucid/subversion/ppa >> lp:~svn/ubuntu/karmic/subversion/ppa >> lp:~svn/ubuntu/jaunty/subversion/ppa >> lp:~svn/ubuntu/hardy/subversion/ppa >> >> Dapper is too hard to backport to. > > And really, anyone running the current minus 2 LTS has no cause to > expect software updates. Agreed. >> (And then there's Subversion 1.6.13 out, too.) > > Hmm. Why don't we just jump straight to that? NB that since Debian is in > pre-release freeze, it's entirely likely that Peter will not upload > that. Neither will it make its way into Ubuntu until some time after > Natty Narwhal repositories open for general updates. Peter managed to get an "unblock request" acknowledged for 1.6.12dfsg-2, so that will go into Squeeze by tomorrow. He intends to release 1.6.13 to experimental or unstable once this has happened. I'd like to provide 1.6.12dfsg-2 to my existing user base, just for the security fix. After that, sure, let's tackle 1.6.13. > In which case, are you familiar with bzr-builddeb's 'bzr merge-package' > command? We should definitely use it, it's the de-facto standard for > importing upstream versions into a packaging branch. Sorry, I can't say I am, but I'll have a look. > Documentation may be scarce. I'll see what I can find and/or write a > summary myself. That would be great, thanks in advance. -- Michael Diers, elego Software Solutions GmbH, http://www.elego.de _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~svn Post to : svn@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~svn More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
