Craig
Here is the working set

$ show work
  Working Set (pagelets)  /Limit=2352  /Quota=4704  /Extent=262144
  Adjustment enabled      Authorized Quota=4704  Authorized Extent=262144

  Working Set (8Kb pages) /Limit=147  /Quota=294  /Extent=16384
                          Authorized Quota=294  Authorized Extent=16384
$ sh proc/acc/id=000002F2

25-AUG-2011 13:57:44.51   User: CMSUSR          Process ID:   000002F2
                          Node: WAYC            Process name: "CMSUSR"

Accounting information:
 Buffered I/O count:      2372  Peak working set size:      57840
 Direct I/O count:        1049  Peak virtual size:         368848
 Page faults:             6243  Mounted volumes:                0
 Images activated:           2
 Elapsed CPU time:          0 00:00:03.66
 Connect time:             20 22:00:38.97

Does this help?

thanks


Jackson, Craig (Gale) wrote:
> 
> What kind of working set does the process have?
> 
> Java on VMS wants a lot more memory than many VMS applications.
> 
> Craig Jackson
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gnan Shabada
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 12:03 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Performance on OpenVMS
> 
> 
> Hello
> I am trying to run "jsvn st <module-name>" from OpenVMS. This is run from
> within a directory which has about 4000+ files.  My repo is on a remote
> windows server. This command takes about 16 secs to come back with a
> response. While the same command if I run from my windows client/working
> dir, it takes 2 secs. Is there any fine tuning that could be done to
> improve
> the time?
> 
> thanks
> -- 
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Performance-on-OpenVMS-tp32335593p32335593.html
> Sent from the SVNKit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Performance-on-OpenVMS-tp32335593p32336523.html
Sent from the SVNKit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Reply via email to