Craig
Here is the working set
$ show work
Working Set (pagelets) /Limit=2352 /Quota=4704 /Extent=262144
Adjustment enabled Authorized Quota=4704 Authorized Extent=262144
Working Set (8Kb pages) /Limit=147 /Quota=294 /Extent=16384
Authorized Quota=294 Authorized Extent=16384
$ sh proc/acc/id=000002F2
25-AUG-2011 13:57:44.51 User: CMSUSR Process ID: 000002F2
Node: WAYC Process name: "CMSUSR"
Accounting information:
Buffered I/O count: 2372 Peak working set size: 57840
Direct I/O count: 1049 Peak virtual size: 368848
Page faults: 6243 Mounted volumes: 0
Images activated: 2
Elapsed CPU time: 0 00:00:03.66
Connect time: 20 22:00:38.97
Does this help?
thanks
Jackson, Craig (Gale) wrote:
>
> What kind of working set does the process have?
>
> Java on VMS wants a lot more memory than many VMS applications.
>
> Craig Jackson
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gnan Shabada
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 12:03 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Performance on OpenVMS
>
>
> Hello
> I am trying to run "jsvn st <module-name>" from OpenVMS. This is run from
> within a directory which has about 4000+ files. My repo is on a remote
> windows server. This command takes about 16 secs to come back with a
> response. While the same command if I run from my windows client/working
> dir, it takes 2 secs. Is there any fine tuning that could be done to
> improve
> the time?
>
> thanks
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Performance-on-OpenVMS-tp32335593p32335593.html
> Sent from the SVNKit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Performance-on-OpenVMS-tp32335593p32336523.html
Sent from the SVNKit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.