Hello Randy,

I think your use-case should be well supported by SVNKit and it works
in many applications already.

May be if you may create a self-contained test that reproduces the
problem, then it will be easier for me to find the problem in your
code.
Thanks!

Alexander Kitaev,
TMate Software,
http://svnkit.com/ - Java [Sub]Versioning Library!
http://hg4j.com/ - Java Mercurial Library!
http://sqljet.com/ - Java SQLite Library!



On 21 September 2011 20:45, Cobb, Randal <[email protected]> wrote:
> My apologies… fat-fingered the transcribe… it IS a List of SVNRevisionRange 
> objects.   And how I'm constructing them could be part of the issue.  After I 
> detect the eligible revisions to merge, I'm adding them to the List with this:
>
> revisionsToMerge.add(new SVNRevisionRange(SVNRevision.create(eligibleRev-1), 
> SVNRevision.create(eligibleRev)));
>
> It basically iterates over a segmented list of eligible revisions (i.e. 
> "9434", "9522", "9543", "9544", etc.) to construct the SVNRevisionRange 
> objects.
>
> the final goal is to display a list of eligible revisions on a GUI page, have 
> the end-user select the specific revisions to merge, then have the process 
> perform the merge.  As an interim step and proof-of-concept, I'm just 
> iterating over ALL the eligible revisions until the actual merge process 
> works as expected, so I'm basically taking the entire list of eligible 
> revisions, adding them to a list of SVNRevisionRange objects, then iterating 
> over that list trying to merge each one individually.
>
> Cheers!
> Randy
>
>
>
> On Sep 21, 2011, at 2:30 PM, Alexander Kitaev wrote:
>
>> Hello Randy,
>>
>>> …with "rangeToMerge" containing the eligible revision numbers from a 
>>> List<SVNRevision>
>>
>> rangeToMerge should be a list of SVNRevisionRange objects, not
>> SVNRevision. I think this might be a reason of the problem.
>>
>> However, I think you should rather get a ClassCastException, then just
>> no merge being performed...
>>
>> Alexander Kitaev,
>> TMate Software,
>> http://svnkit.com/ - Java [Sub]Versioning Library!
>> http://hg4j.com/ - Java Mercurial Library!
>> http://sqljet.com/ - Java SQLite Library!
>>
>>
>>
>> On 21 September 2011 20:09, Cobb, Randal <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I am somewhat new to SVNkit, so I'm sure I'm simply doing something wrong 
>>> or what I need to educate myself on, but I can't seem to find out exactly 
>>> WHAT…
>>>
>>> I have the following scenario:  I need to programmatically check out a 
>>> branch from a repository, then determine the eligible revision numbers to 
>>> merge in from an up-stream branch, then merge in each of those eligible 
>>> revisions (one at a time in a loop so I can programmatically preserve the 
>>> author) into the newly checked out working copy, finally committing the 
>>> merged in revisions.
>>>
>>> I've been able to successfully checkout a fresh working copy, and determine 
>>> the list of eligible revisions, but it seems to not do anything on the 
>>> actual merge itself (command-line "svn status" shows no changes in the 
>>> working copy after each iteration through the loop) but a manual diff 
>>> between the two branches shows a large number of changes.
>>>
>>> Here's the form of doMerge I'm using:
>>>
>>> for (SVNRevision rangeToMerge : eligibleRevisions) {
>>>    diffClient.doMerge(url, SVNRevision.HEAD, 
>>> Collections.singleton(rangeToMerge), target, SVNDepth.UNKNOWN, true, false, 
>>> false, false);
>>> }
>>>
>>> …with "rangeToMerge" containing the eligible revision numbers from a 
>>> List<SVNRevision>, "url" being the SOURCE branch SVNURL, and "target" being 
>>> the freshly checked-out working copy folder.  The only argument I'm not 
>>> sure about is the SVNRevision.HEAD as the pegRevision value, should this be 
>>> set to the revision I want to merge from, or should that be NULL?
>>>
>>> I've also tried setting the "force" value to true, but I get similar 
>>> results.
>>>
>>> Would anyone please be so kind as to suggest anything or anywhere I should 
>>> start looking?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>> Randy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
>>> addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. 
>>> If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized 
>>> representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
>>> dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have 
>>> received this communication in error, notify the sender immediately by 
>>> return email and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>

Reply via email to