Madan U S wrote:
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:11:42 +0530, Giovanni Bajo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Madan U S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> $ pychecker --version
>>> $ pychecker svnmerge.py
>>> svnmerge.py:85: Statement appears to have no effect
[snip]
>>> svnmerge.py:1423: Using is not None, may not always work
>>>
>>> I cleaned up a few today already, but I've got other work to do now :)
>>
>> Okay... I see that the number has visibly reduced now. How should I make
>> patches fixing these... as a single patch, or as individual fixes?
>
> Last time I checked, many were bogus ones. For instance, I'm opposed to
> avoid the "is [not] None" paradigm.
Well, now, I dont see a single "is [not] None" error from pychecker.
Anyways, why were you oppposed to it?
I will start working on the rest... will send multiple fixes in every
patch. I hope this is fine.
Trying multiple versions of pychecker, it looks like older versions of the tool
generate more warnings. The "None" warnings are generated by 0.8.14. Newer
versions don't give those warnings.
Regards,
Blair
--
Blair Zajac, Ph.D.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subversion training, consulting and support
http://www.orcaware.com/svn/
_______________________________________________
Svnmerge mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.orcaware.com/mailman/listinfo/svnmerge
