Blair Zajac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> That would be one quick solution. Surely, it's better than the >> current situation. >> >> OTOH, I wonder what's the best long-time solution. I think the best >> scenario is "exporting" the --non-interactive switch: forward it to >> "svn" when passed, but forward back interactive prompts from svn to >> the user when they pop-up. I'm not sure how much work this would be, >> though. Maybe we could have some regexp to identify the prompts, and >> some heuristic to decide how many previous lines of "context" to >> display. Then we should enter a kind of echo mode. Does this make >> sense at all? > > That sounds like a lot of work. People using svnmerge.py would > hopefully be familiar with the command line client, and I would > rather just let it take tty input.
svnmerge does not forward svn output. How do they know it's waiting for input? Giovanni Bajo _______________________________________________ Svnmerge mailing list [email protected] http://www.orcaware.com/mailman/listinfo/svnmerge
