Madan U Sreenivasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [[[ >> Accept -rX-Y, for all svnmerge commands, where X > Y. >> Before this patch, empty RevisionSet()s were created when X > Y. >> >> * contrib/client-side/svnmerge_test.py >> (TestCase_RevisionSet.test_reverse_order_input_string): New >> test. Try creating a RevisionSet() with a string range, in >> descending order. >> >> * contrib/client-side/svnmerge.py >> (RevisionSet.__init__): Sort the input revision range before >> filling in RevisionSet._revs. >> ]]]
Rationale? "svn merge" accepts the reversed order with a different semantic (reversed merge). I'm worried about the confusion that can issue. I am +1 on a patch that errors out when X > Y until there is agreement on how to best handle this. Giovanni Bajo _______________________________________________ Svnmerge mailing list [email protected] http://www.orcaware.com/mailman/listinfo/svnmerge
