Giovanni Bajo wrote: > Steven Shanks wrote: >> This revision (101) only contains the change to the svnmerge-blocked >> property, and as far as I understand, this doesn't and shouldn't apply >> to the trunk? So my natural reaction would be to try and block it, >> which would lead to revision 102 being a possible merge for the >> branch, and so on... > > Yes, we do not consider changes to blocked-prop as reflected revisions. I > consider this a missing feature. Try this patch:
This is related to an earlier message and patch by Rich Williams, to consider initialized revs as reflected. Should we combine the two patches and maybe handle this more generally? Cheers, Raman _______________________________________________ Svnmerge mailing list [email protected] http://www.orcaware.com/mailman/listinfo/svnmerge
