On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 18:52:22 +0530, Steven Shanks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I block this revision (105) in branchA, then svnmerge.py will > recognise that this was a bi-directional block, and the problem will > disappear, but I have now had to block several revisions after > committing one. If it became necessary to add a third or fourth branch > to this setup, then the problem only increases. > Does anyone have any suggestions on how I might avoid this problem, or > ways I could change my setup to minimise it? > Thanks for any help, and apologies for the length of this post! Right now, no. (Of course, you do know that you could use a revision range instead of individual revision in the 'block' subcommand, right?) But I would be interested in knowing how you would like this problem to be solved. Regards, Madan. _______________________________________________ Svnmerge mailing list [email protected] http://www.orcaware.com/mailman/listinfo/svnmerge
