Daniel Rall wrote: > On Thu, 09 Nov 2006, Blair Zajac wrote: > ... >> However, how is the svn merge tracking in 1.5 or greater going to work? Is >> it >> always going to effectively have the -b flag set? > > Yes. > >> We had this discussion before, but I would much rather see the -b >> flag always set to reduce the possibility of errors. If the svn 1.5 >> merge tracking will always have bidirectional support on, then I >> think svnmerge.py should too. > > I tend to think so, too. Why is bi-directional support in svnmerge.py > off by default (other than it being added later on); does it result in > a performance problem?
Yes. IIRC, Giovanni had performance concerns about using bidirectional support with svn repositories that aren't on the LAN. I was outvoted :) Regards, Blair _______________________________________________ Svnmerge mailing list [email protected] http://www.orcaware.com/mailman/listinfo/svnmerge
