+1. The docs should also be updated.
Blair Archie Cobbs wrote: > Fine with me to remove it.. it's served it's purpose :-) > > On 3/16/07, Giovanni Bajo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> is there any reason for still keeping svnmerge.sh on trunk? Can it be >> removed? >> I think it only contributes to confusion at this point. >> -- >> Giovanni Bajo >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Svnmerge mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.orcaware.com/mailman/listinfo/svnmerge _______________________________________________ Svnmerge mailing list [email protected] http://www.orcaware.com/mailman/listinfo/svnmerge
